Your poll only allows one choice. That's fine if you just want to know people's favourite, but I would expect that many people use more than one source.
Back in the 70's and 80's, I used Computaform, and then switched to Sporting Post as I enjoyed the editorial and write-ups, it was better value for money in giving multiple cards, and I found that the ratings were closer to my own. It also helped my growing interest in breeding.
When I had lots of time as a scholar and a student, I kept my own data manually, and in the 70's started writing my own little data and comparison programs.
There was no substitute for attending race meetings and seeing the horses in the flesh in the parade ring and the canter past, and learning to "read" a race.
Visiting the training tracks on a Saturday morning is another experience that the armchair punter misses out on.
The early days of television coverage changed the game, with the ability to tape the races and watch the races that you couldn't attend.
As an owner, getting to know trainers, breeders, agents and jockeys and getting the benefit of their knowledge and experience has made a huge difference.
Punting for me is a recreational activity, not dissimilar from playing a game of bridge or poker, doing a crossword or sudoku puzzle.
As such, the object of the game is to pick winners and winning bets myself- I enjoy exchanging opinions and views, but at the end of it, every bet must be my own choice.
Newspaper coverage used to be helpful- for more than a decade it has been nothing more than the fields and the occasional article.
On line sources have become most important- trainers websites; podcasts; USO on tellytrack; forums such as this.
Formgrids is a very good data source, although I personally use it more for statistics than for form analysis.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Craig Pienaar
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.