Co-migling - bigger pools = bigger dividends..!!! (?)

According to Robert Garner (Keeping Track 21st April 2008)

Does bigger pools mean bigger divis...? If there is 10K in the pool and the fav is returned evens, what price would it be returned if there is 100k in the pool.

Co-mingling, hyped, adored, punted mercilessly by Phumelela as something to be proud of, so how much better will SA tote punters be..?

Remember the 2007 French Oaks debacle.

This is one of my pet hates, and can find plenty more on this subject, but dont be conned!!

CO-MINGLING?


Note! This was an extract from an early Scotia in the morning posts with regards to the co-mingling French fiasco????????????????????????????????????




I also posted on the site with regards the 2 horse race, makes its so much easier to check what pressure the normal "punter" is up against, I posted PLEASE don't make them both "money-on", however blackpearl at 7/10 and 11/10 tried to come to the party, Interbet at racetime came to the party in-line with Betfair with 8/10 and 12/10 at 100%, but the early prices from the bookies at 6/10 and 9/10 shocking, but the shocker was the TOTE with 7/10 the winner and "NOT TOTE FAV", this must surely expose to the poor punter in the tote how much the "rip off" factor is. I will say this one more time as it totally infuriates me that the French co-mingling fiasco when Dettori won on the 6/1 shot and it paid 11/10 on the tote and "WAS NOT THE TOTE FAV", just wish more people could read these posts on the site, and after my inputs on Saturday, many people do read the site, but don't post.

Robert Garner is well aware that bigger pools do not necessarily mean bigger dividends but is obliged to keep his bosses happy.