NHRA RULING

So today's ruling is based on the fact that the interference happened 1 to 1.5 strides before the line and based on that the 13 could not have beaten the 2.

I have to ask myself why, in today's modern electronic era, we continue to rely on subjective drivel as opposed to objective reasoning and measurement.

It is clear that in the last 50m to 100m of the race that the momentum of 13 indicates based on speed and margin at the finish, that but for the interference, 13 wins the race.

Prove me wrong with measurements and calculations NHRA.... Moodleys opinion holds absolutely no merit with me.

 

was this the main race? Can't believe the Bortz horse was not awarded the race

Yip

Even the commentator believes 13 will win in real time..... obviously Moodley has a magical subjective crystal that gives the answer....

it's an absolute disgrace that the objection was NOT upheld.  yes,  talking from my pocket cost me plenty in Yankees & trebles.
I  think RANDOLPH   was at least 10's or 12"s  in my yankee.......   u  do the maths. !!!

one bet alone TRIXIE     was 3,000 / 35......  yes for 35 bucks..

The over-ruled objection imo is ridiculous - up there with the Red Cards given to the 'Boks; then the Ref went totally crazy with all the Yellow Cards yesterday - but one has to say that the 'Boks scrummed the Irish inot submission 

That should have been upheld .
If this matter is taken to court that result will be reversed i.m.o 

Vee's Explanation:

As most of you on here, i too am surprised that the result did not change. (no financial gain)
 

100% Disagree with Vee, that bump cost the second the race... But it's history now

We clearly need some Artificial Intelligence for these objections... I would love to see a digital replay without the interference...